Lorikeet
by Lorikeet · Sydney, Australia · Founded 2023
Built for complex, regulated support
Overview
Lorikeet was built on the observation that most AI support agents handle simple questions well and escalate anything genuinely hard — which leaves the expensive tickets untouched. Its graph-based agent design follows explicit multi-step procedures with conditional logic, so it can work through cases like disputed transactions, KYC checks or clinical scheduling that require several dependent decisions. Fintech and healthcare customers are its core. It requires more upfront work than a knowledge-base bot because you define those procedures, and it is a smaller vendor with a shorter track record than the enterprise names.
Our verdict
Attacks the tickets that actually cost money — the complex multi-step ones every other agent escalates. If your expensive support volume is disputes, verification or clinical scheduling, this is more relevant than a higher deflection rate on simple questions. Expect real setup work.
Best for
Fintech and healthcare teams whose costly tickets are complex multi-step cases.
Avoid if
Your support is mostly simple FAQs — a knowledge-base agent is cheaper and faster.
Pros
- Handles genuinely complex multi-step cases, not just FAQs
- Audit trail on agent decisions for regulated review
- HIPAA and ISO 27001 coverage at a small-vendor scale
Cons
- You must define the procedures — real setup effort
- Small vendor with a short track record
- No published pricing
Key capabilities
Frequently asked questions
What is a graph-based agent?
Lorikeet models support procedures as explicit graphs with conditional branches, so the agent follows dependent multi-step logic rather than retrieving an answer from documentation.
Who is Lorikeet best for?
Fintech and healthcare teams whose expensive tickets are complex — disputed transactions, KYC checks, clinical scheduling — rather than simple FAQs a knowledge-base agent already handles.
How much does Lorikeet cost?
Lorikeet does not publish pricing. Contracts are quoted by resolution volume and case complexity, typically $30,000 to $150,000 per year.
