Macroscope
by Macroscope
AI code review plus cloud agents that verify their work
Reviewed by the the30top research team · Last reviewed 2026-10-27
Overview
Macroscope reviews pull requests for correctness, security and regressions, and adds status updates and cloud agents that write and verify code in sandboxes. It integrates with GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack, Sentry, Claude Code and Codex, and says it does not train models on your source code. Pricing is usage-based with $100 of free usage to start, so monthly cost depends on how many reviews and agent runs you trigger.
Our verdict
Worth trying if you want review plus agents and status reporting in one tool. Usage-based billing makes cost hard to predict, so watch spend in the trial.
Best for
Teams that want code review, status reporting and sandboxed agents from one vendor.
Avoid if
You need a fixed per-seat price.
Pros
- SOC 2 Type II stated
- States zero model training on your code
- Can run in your own cloud VPC
Cons
- Usage-based pricing is harder to forecast
- Scope has grown beyond pure review
- Per-credit rates not shown on the page reviewed
Key capabilities
Frequently asked questions
How does Macroscope pricing work?
The Teams plan is usage-based with $100 of free usage and 1,000 credits a month. Enterprise is by contact.
Does Macroscope train on my code?
The site states zero model training: Macroscope does not train models using your source code.
Can I run it in my own cloud?
Yes. You can host VMs in Macroscope's cloud or manage them in your own GCP or AWS VPCs.